Connect with us

US Politics

Trump administration sued over concerns ballroom demolition crews were exposed to cancer-causing materials

Published

on


Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it’s investigating the financials of Elon Musk’s pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, ‘The A Word’, which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Read more

The Trump administration will not release information on whether it removed or released the carcinogenic compound asbestos during its sudden demolition of the White House’s East Wing as part of President Trump’s planned ballroom project, a lawsuit claims.

The Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization filed the suit Wednesday in Washington, D.C., federal court, alleging agencies like the National Park Service, Department of the Interior, OSHA, EPA and the White House have failed to comply with a Freedom of Information Act request about what kind of precautions were taken ahead of the three-day demolition project.

The East Wing, which was built in 1902 and renovated in 1942, “likely contained asbestos and other hazardous materials,” given that such materials were used “extensively” at the time, according to the suit.

“When an Administration bypasses required safety procedures or withholds documentation of the measures it took to prevent harm, it erodes public trust and weakens protections required by law to safeguard the American people and public resources,” the suit reads.

“We want to know if they did it,” Linda Reinstein, founder of Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization, told The Washington Post. “Why can’t they just tell us — what’s the big secret here?”

The White House and federal agencies are failing to provide information about whether they did asbestos abatement during the demolition of the East Wing last fall

open image in gallery

The White House and federal agencies are failing to provide information about whether they did asbestos abatement during the demolition of the East Wing last fall (Getty Images)

Asbestos abatement at the White House has occurred on previous projects, according to the Post, though the paper found no notification of such work with D.C. authorities for the ballroom project.

The agencies have been ignoring the organization’s requests for information since October, the lawsuit claims.

The Independent has contacted the named parties for comment.

The EPA directed questions to the White House.

“Any hazardous material abatement was done in September,” a White House official told The Independent. “A very extensive abatement and remediation assessment was followed, complying with all applicable federal standards.”

The president’s ballroom plan has faced scrutiny over the private donations funding it and the legal process used to initiate the project

open image in gallery

The president’s ballroom plan has faced scrutiny over the private donations funding it and the legal process used to initiate the project (JIM WATSON/AFP via Getty Images)

The administration will present its plans publicly for the first time on Thursday, at a meeting of the National Capital Planning Commission.

The president has said construction could conclude as soon as March if all goes to plan.

The $400 million ballroom project, which is funded in part by tech industry donors to the Trump campaign and inauguration, has been controversial since its inception.

In December, the National Trust for Historic Preservation sued over the project, alleging it began before the administration went through the required legal review process.

Democratic lawmakers, meanwhile, have questioned whether the private funding of the project amounts to “special-interest access to the Trump Administration and influence peddling by giant corporations.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *