Connect with us

US Politics

Trump cleared to send National Guard into Portland after appeals court ruling

Published

on


Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it’s investigating the financials of Elon Musk’s pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, ‘The A Word’, which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Read more

President Donald Trump may deploy the Oregon National Guard into Portland, despite objections by local officials, a federal appeals court said Monday.

A divided three-judge panel on the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the administration, claiming Trump “lawfully exercised his statutory authority” when he attempted to deploy the Guard to the city amid anti-immigration raid protests.

On the panel, two Trump-appointed judges agreed the administration relied on evidence that fell “‘within a range of honest judgement’” to determine the National Guard was needed to execute the laws of the United States.

In September, Trump attempted to federalize 200 members of the Oregon National Guard to protect federal agents that he sent into the city, claiming Portland was “war ravaged” and “under siege from attack by Antifa.” Trump has often made Portland, a progressive city with a long history of protests, the target of insults and threats.

State and local officials have disputed Trump’s characterization of Portland.

A district court judge sided with those officials earlier this month, when she temporarily halted the administration’s deployment of the National Guard.

Protests opposing Trump’s expansive use of his executive authority have spurred clashes between civilians and federal law enforcement in Portland

open image in gallery

Protests opposing Trump’s expansive use of his executive authority have spurred clashes between civilians and federal law enforcement in Portland (Getty Images)
State and local officials have disputed Trump’s characterization of Portland

open image in gallery

State and local officials have disputed Trump’s characterization of Portland (Getty Images)
Oregon or Portland could appeal the decision to the Supreme Court or ask an 11-judge panel on the 9th Circuit to review the three-judge panel’s decision

open image in gallery

Oregon or Portland could appeal the decision to the Supreme Court or ask an 11-judge panel on the 9th Circuit to review the three-judge panel’s decision (AP)

The district court judge stated that the president did not have a legitimate argument for deploying the Oregon National Guard, citing that the protests were “generally peaceful” with occasional confrontations between civilians and federal law enforcement. The judge said local law enforcement was equipped to handle those small incidents.

But lawyers for the government argued to the 9th Circuit judges that the guard was necessary because protests in Portland have gone on for months with occasional civil disobedience that local enforcement cannot control.

They cited several incidents throughout the summer, including some where protesters “threw rocks and sticks” at an ICE facility guard shack, “attempted to set a U.S. flag on fire in the driveway of the ICE facility,” and one “shot officers with a paintball gun.”

Protests conducted outside of a Portland ICE facility have becoming increasingly more confrontational as federal agents sent to protect immigration law enforcement use tear gas and other tactics to control crowds

open image in gallery

Protests conducted outside of a Portland ICE facility have becoming increasingly more confrontational as federal agents sent to protect immigration law enforcement use tear gas and other tactics to control crowds (Getty Images)

open image in gallery

(AP)

Ultimately, two of the three judges on the 9th Circuit agreed with the administration.

“Even if the President may exaggerate the extent of the problem on social media, this does not change that other facts provide a colorable basis to support the statutory requirements,” the judges wrote.

Trump has continuously invoked a rarely-used presidential power that allows the president to take control of a state’s National Guard in the event of an invasion, a rebellion against the government or when the president cannot execute laws with regular force.

Over the summer, he sent the California National Guard to Los Angeles amid anti-immigration raid protests. However, a federal judge later determined the administration violated the Posse Comitatus Act, which prevents the military from being used for domestic law enforcement.

Among the more aggressive actions protesters have taken, is burning a flag – which is a form of protected speech in the US

open image in gallery

Among the more aggressive actions protesters have taken, is burning a flag – which is a form of protected speech in the US (AP)

Trump has also sent the National Guard to Chicago, against the wishes of state and local officials for similar reasons. A legal battle over the matter has been escalated to the Supreme Court.

The president deployed National Guard members in Washington, D.C., as well. However, Trump has more authority over the D.C. National Guard than other states due to jurisdiction.

National Guard troops are expected to be deployed elsewhere around the U.S. as Trump seeks to impose his deportation agenda and crackdown on crime in other cities.

Monday’s ruling is likely not the last word on the matter. Oregon or Portland could appeal the decision to the Supreme Court or ask an 11-judge panel on the 9th Circuit to review the three-judge panel’s decision.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *