Connect with us

US Politics

The FBI is using lie detectors to test employee loyalty to Trump’s appointees

Published

on


Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it’s investigating the financials of Elon Musk’s pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, ‘The A Word’, which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Read more

The FBI has reportedly stepped up its use of polygraph lie-detector tests on bureau staff, as Director Kash Patel allegedly hunts for agents who have criticized his leadership or leaked to the news media.

Sources told The New York Times that dozens of FBI personnel had been questioned. That includes a senior employee, asked if they had said anything negative about Patel, and another who was subject to an interview as the bureau sought to discover who told journalists about Patel’s unusual request for a service weapon.

The lie detector tests, the sources said, marked a break from precedent at the FBI, where such tests were more commonly used against those thought to have betrayed the country or to have committed major offenses.

Michael Feinberg, who was a former top agent at the FBI office in Norfolk, Virginia, until the spring, claimed he was threatened with a polygraph over his friendship with Peter Strzok, a counterintelligence official involved in the FBI’s probe into the Trump-Russia allegations and who was later fired for sending negative messages about Trump.

Feinberg resigned and never took the polygraph test.

The FBI has reportedly increased its use of polygraph tests against its own employees, alarming some insiders who say this breaks with precedent

open image in gallery

The FBI has reportedly increased its use of polygraph tests against its own employees, alarming some insiders who say this breaks with precedent (Getty Images)

Referring to the FBI director and his deputy, Feinberg wrote in Lawfare: “Under Patel and Bongino, subject matter expertise and operational competence are readily sacrificed for ideological purity and the ceaseless politicization of the work force.”

The FBI declined to comment on the Times report, given that it involved “personnel matters and internal deliberations.”

In addition to reportedly testing its own employees, the FBI has launched an investigation into former FBI Director James Comey (left) and former CIA Director John Brennan (right), thought to be related to the pair’s involvement in allegations Russia sought to help the Trump 2016 campaign

open image in gallery

In addition to reportedly testing its own employees, the FBI has launched an investigation into former FBI Director James Comey (left) and former CIA Director John Brennan (right), thought to be related to the pair’s involvement in allegations Russia sought to help the Trump 2016 campaign (AFP via Getty Images)

Critics of Patel, whose book Government Gangsters featured an appendix containing an “enemies list,” feared he could politicize the agency, which was a frequent target of criticism from President Donald Trump.

The FBI has also reportedly launched a criminal investigations into former CIA Director John Brennan and former FBI Director James Comey after a referral from current CIA chief John Ratcliffe, thought to be tied to the Obama-and Trump-era officials’ involvement in investigations into the president.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *