US Politics
Israel’s imminent attack on Iran forced US to join war, says Rubio
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it’s investigating the financials of Elon Musk’s pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, ‘The A Word’, which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.
Read more
Secretary of State Marco Rubio has sparked fury after suggesting that the US was forced into attacking Iran after being told Israel planned to launch strikes first.
Joint US-Israeli strikes on Iran on Saturday triggered mayhem in the region, with several Gulf countries being hit by Iranian retaliatory attacks.
At least 555 people have been killed in Iran since the war began, while six US service members have died.
Mr Rubio said President Donald Trump was forced into a preemptive response after learning of an imminent Israeli attack, as officials knew such an attack would trigger retaliation against US military personnel in the Middle East.
“It was abundantly clear that if Iran came under attack by anyone – the United States or Israel or anyone – they were going to respond, and respond against the United States,” the secretary of state told reporters at the Capitol on Monday.
“We knew that there was going to be an Israeli action. We knew that that would precipitate an attack against American forces, and we knew that if we didn’t pre-emptively go after them before they launched those attacks, we would suffer higher casualties.”
open image in gallery
The US on Tuesday ordered non-emergency government personnel and their family members to leave Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, Iraq and Jordan and closed several diplomatic missions across the region as tensions with Iran escalated.
Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday claimed that Israel and the US were attempting to “save the world” through their war on Iran.
“You see the difference. The tyrants of Tehran are attacking civilians. We are attacking the tyrants of Tehran to protect the civilian population,” he told reporters on a visit to Beit Shemesh, where nine Israelis were killed by an Iranian missile strike.
The extent of America’s military cooperation with Israel has proved a divisive issue for Trump among his Maga base. In June last year, Trump’s decision to launch a bombing campaign against Iran’s nuclear facilities sparked a backlash from some Conservative commentators, who argued that the US should not be involved in wars in the region.
Mr Rubio’s comments provoked a similar backlash from American politicians.
“There was no imminent threat to the United States of America by the Iranians,” said Mark Warner, the Democratic vice-chair of the Senate intelligence committee.
“There was a threat to Israel. If we equate a threat to Israel as the equivalent of an imminent threat to the United States, then we are in uncharted territory.”
open image in gallery
Democratic congressman Joaquin Castro wrote: “Secretary Rubio’s remarks indicate that Israel put US forces in harm’s way by insisting on attacking Iran.
“And the administration was complicit – joining their war instead of talking them down.”
Domestic polls suggest that Trump’s decision to attack Iran is not popular with Americans. According to a survey by CNN, 60 per cent of Americans fear that Trump does not have a clear plan for handling the situation and almost a third (62 per cent) believe he should get congressional approval for any further military action.
US secretary of war Pete Hegseth said at a press conference on Monday afternoon that there would be “no more stupid rules of engagement”.
“No stupid rules of engagement, no nation-building quagmire, no democracy-building exercise, no politically-correct wars. We fight to win,” he said.
Mr Hegseth reiterated the Trump administration’s justification for the war, insisting they had taken the action in order to “finish” what Iran had started.
“For 47 long years, the expansionist and Islamist regime in Tehran has waged savage, one-sided war against America,” Mr Hegseth said. “They didn’t always declare it openly, except for their constant chants of ‘Death to America’; they did it through the blood of our people.”
He added: “We didn’t start this war but under President Trump, we are finishing it.”
President Trump explained: “This was our last, best chance to strike, what we’re doing right now, and eliminate the intolerable threats posed by this sick and sinister regime.”
However, US officials told Pentagon staff on Sunday that there were no signs that Iran would attack first.
The killing of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has prompted attacks by Hezbollah in Lebanon, who have promised to avenge the death of the Iranian leader. Israeli attacks on southern Lebanon have killed at least 31 people.
