Connect with us

US Politics

Zohran Mamdani’s wife Rama Duwaji apologizes for ’harmful’ social media posts

Published

on


Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it’s investigating the financials of Elon Musk’s pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, ‘The A Word’, which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Read more

Rama Duwaji, the wife of New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, has issued an apology for “harmful” social media posts she made as a teenager.

Her public statement follows a conservative news outlet’s investigation into her online profiles, which resurfaced material including a post containing an anti-gay slur.

In an interview with the arts website Hyperallergic, Duwaji, an illustrator by profession, conveyed “a lot of shame being confronted with language I used that is so harmful to others,” adding that “being 15 doesn’t excuse it.”

She further stated, “I’ve read and seen a lot of what others have had to say in response, and I understand the hurt I caused and am truly sorry.”

Mayor Mamdani previously described his wife as a ‘private person’ who does not hold a formal position in City Hall
Mayor Mamdani previously described his wife as a ‘private person’ who does not hold a formal position in City Hall (Getty)

Duwaji did not specify which comments she was referring to, nor did she address other, more recent social media activity concerning Israel.

This activity has drawn considerable scrutiny as Mayor Mamdani endeavors to alleviate concerns among some in the city’s Jewish community regarding his own criticisms of Israel’s treatment of Palestinians.

Last month, The Washington Free Beacon reported on years of Duwaji’s online activity across various platforms.

Their findings included posts praising female Palestinian militants involved in plane hijackings and bombings in the 1960s and early 1970s.

In 2015, she shared a post where another individual wrote that Tel Aviv was occupying Palestinian land and “shouldn’t exist.”

The report also noted Duwaji’s use of a racial slur for Black people, albeit while affectionately addressing a friend, and an abbreviated slur for gay people in 2013.

When asked about the posts his wife regretted, Mamdani said, ‘What I will say, however, is that she is someone of incredible integrity’
When asked about the posts his wife regretted, Mamdani said, ‘What I will say, however, is that she is someone of incredible integrity’ (AP)

Mayor Mamdani previously described his wife as a “private person” who does not hold a formal position in City Hall.

When asked Thursday about the specific posts his wife regretted, Mamdani demurred, stating, “She shared some of her reflections in this interview. I won’t add much to them, what I will say, however, is that she is someone of incredible integrity.”

He added that questions about Duwaji’s social media activity were “part and parcel” of his decision to run for mayor, “a decision that has ramifications for those that I love.”

Separately, Duwaji has faced criticism for liking an Instagram post that appeared to celebrate Hamas’ October 7, 2023, surprise attack on Israel.

The Free Beacon also reported that Duwaji provided an illustration for an essay by an author who described the October 7 attack as “spectacular” and referred to Jewish Israelis as “rootless soulless ghouls.”

Mamdani clarified that his wife had been commissioned to illustrate an excerpt of a book by a third party, had never engaged with or met the author, and had not seen the author’s previous comments.

He condemned the author’s rhetoric as “patently unacceptable” and “reprehensible.”



Source link

Continue Reading