Connect with us

Breaking News

Who are the winners and losers of Trump’s tariffs?

Published

on


The penguins have been offered some relief. The people of Switzerland, Laos and Syria, not so much.

This is the unlikely jumble of winners and losers of President Donald Trump’s finalized list of tariffs, which governments, markets and businesses across the globe were scrambling to make sense of Friday.

Some countries, such as Canada and South Africa, reacted with grave disappointment, warning that Trump’s executive order could prompt job losses globally and rising costs for Americans. For others, the damage was not as bad as expected, with some able to thrash out deals before his deadline, and others hopeful of striking one in the future.

The president had already drawn confusion and alarm when first unveiling his tariff list in April.

Many analysts questioned, for example, why he was imposing a 10% levy on Heard and McDonald — two Antarctic outposts populated solely by penguins — or slapping a colossal 50% rate on the impoverished southern African nation of Lesotho.

A waddle of King penguins standing on the shores of the Australian territory of Heard Island. (Matt Curnock / Australian Antarctic Division)
A waddle of King penguins on the shores of Heard Island. (Matt Curnock / Australian Antarctic Division)

This week’s finalized list elicited reprieve but also dismay— often with little or no explanation.

The harshest import taxes were slapped on Syria (41%), Laos and Myanmar (40%), three relatively poor nations with, at best, modest trading relationships with Washington. And Iraq, Serbia (both 35%) and Algeria (30%) also found themselves subject to Trump’s executive pen.

(Brazil faces its own separate 50% tariff as punishment for what Trump says is a “witch hunt” against its former president and his right-wing ally, Jair Bolsonaro, who is accused of plotting a coup.)

Elsewhere Thursday, Lesotho’s 50% rate was slashed to 15% — but not before huge damage was already wrought. The initial tariff saw American buyers pausing orders, thousands of people losing their jobs and the government declaring a state of disaster.

Meanwhile the Heard and McDonald Islands and its flightless bird inhabitants dodged the tariff Trump threatened to impose on Australia, which owns the islands, and remained at the 10% rate first announced in April.

It is “hard to tell if there is any logic” to deciphering why some countries have been hit so hard while others were spared, said David Henig, a trade expert at the European Center for International Political Economy, a think tank based in Brussels.

Without a detailed explanation from the White House, Henig told NBC News, the calculations were most likely based on the previous formula Washington used that placed the biggest tariffs on the countries with the biggest trade surpluses.

In announcing the tariffs Thursday, Trump said these surpluses “constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and economy of the United States.” (Many economists disagree that the U.S. trade deficit is inherently a bad thing, and his tariffs are the subject of an ongoing legal fight that is likely to end up at the Supreme Court.)

Story Continues



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *