US Politics
Trump rejected more Iran strikes after minimal damage to nuclear sites in first wave, new report says
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it’s investigating the financials of Elon Musk’s pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, ‘The A Word’, which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.
Read more
President Donald Trump rejected a plan for further, more comprehensive U.S. military strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities, a new report states.
The president reportedly halted the new wave of airstrikes after an assessment found that two of the three sites targeted in last month’s cruise-missile and bunker-buster bombs attack sustained only minimal damage, according to five current and former officials cited by NBC News.
The sources said that U.S. Central Command had drafted a far more expansive plan to strike Iran that included targeting three additional sites and unfolding over several weeks, rather than in a single night.
“We were willing to go all the way in our options, but the president did not want to,” one person with knowledge of the plan said.
Trump allegedly rejected the plan because it conflicted with his America First agenda, favored by high-profile conservative figures such as Tucker Carlson, which involves pulling the U.S. out of foreign wars and a potential for higher casualties on both sides, two sources said.
The report was commissioned as part of the Trump administration’s ongoing efforts to assess the status of Iran’s nuclear program, after the president claimed the U.S. military “obliterated” uranium enrichment sites Fordo and Natanz and the major research facility at Isfahan.
Some U.S. lawmakers, Defense Department officials, and allied countries were briefed on the report in recent days, four of the sources said.
It stated that one of the nuclear facilities struck by U.S. strikes last month was mostly destroyed, significantly delaying operations there.
However, two others may have been damaged to a point where nuclear enrichment could resume within the next several months, the sources briefed on the report said.
The report is at odds with the president’s claims that strikes were a “spectacular military success” that left “Iran’s key enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.”
This is a breaking story. More to follow.
